USIP Sues to Block Alleged Government Takeover, Citing Unlawful Actions by Trump Administration and High-Profile Officials

The United States Institute of Peace (USIP), a non-profit organization established by Congress four decades ago, has filed a lawsuit seeking immediate judicial intervention to prevent its forced shutdown. The lawsuit, filed in a federal court, alleges that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) attempted a “takeover by force” of USIP’s headquarters. This action reportedly involved the cooperation of the FBI, the Justice Department, and local Washington D.C. police. The USIP is requesting that a federal judge block these efforts to ensure the organization can continue its operations uninterrupted.

The legal action initiated by USIP includes several high-profile defendants, such as Kenneth Jackson, Assistant to the Administrator for Management and Resources for USAID, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and former President Donald Trump. The lawsuit claims that the Trump administration unlawfully attempted to dismiss USIP President George Moose. This move is part of a broader narrative presented in the lawsuit, which suggests that the administration aimed to exert undue influence over the independent organization.

The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) of Washington D.C. became involved in the situation following a notification from the U.S. Attorney’s Office. The office is currently led by acting U.S. Attorney Ed Martin, who has been noted for his involvement in election-related legal matters. The MPD has been working to clarify its role and response to the incident, amid inquiries from members of the D.C. city council.

As the situation unfolds, the USIP continues to seek legal protection to maintain its operations and independence. The case highlights ongoing tensions between governmental bodies and independent organizations, raising questions about the extent of executive influence over entities established to operate autonomously. The outcome of this legal battle could have significant implications for the future governance and oversight of similar organizations.