Key takeaways:
- Two lawsuits have been brought against Trump by voters in Colorado and Minnesota, citing Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution.
- The 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868, in the aftermath of the Civil War, and was intended to prevent former Confederate leaders from holding office.
- The lawsuits are likely to be closely watched as they could set a precedent for how the amendment is interpreted and applied in the future.
A new legal battle is brewing in several states over former President Donald Trump’s eligibility to appear on the ballot in the 2024 election. Two lawsuits have been brought against Trump by voters in Colorado and Minnesota, citing Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which disqualifies those who have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States from holding federal office.
The New Hampshire Secretary of State, David Scanlan, commented on the situation, saying, “In a situation where some states permit a name to appear on the ballot and other states disqualify it, there’s going to be chaos, confusion, anger and frustration.”
The 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868, in the aftermath of the Civil War, and was intended to prevent former Confederate leaders from holding office. The amendment has rarely been invoked in the past, but this year’s filing period has drawn unusual scrutiny as opponents of Trump are looking to use it to keep him off the ballot.
The lawsuits are likely to be closely watched as they could set a precedent for how the amendment is interpreted and applied in the future. If the courts find in favor of the plaintiffs, it could have a major impact on the 2024 election and could potentially prevent Trump from running for office again.
The outcome of these legal battles is yet to be seen, but it is sure to be a closely watched case that could have major implications for the future of American politics.
Be First to Comment