Key takeaways:
- Rep. Eli Crane (R-AZ) proposed an amendment to the House-passed National Defense Authorization Act, which was adopted in a 214-210 vote.
- Crane referred to Black people as “colored people”, which drew swift rebuke from Democratic lawmakers and the Congressional Black Caucus.
- The incident has sparked a debate over the use of language when discussing race and ethnicity, and has highlighted the importance of using language that is respectful and inclusive.
On Thursday night, during a floor debate over an amendment proposed by first term Rep. Eli Crane (R-AZ) for the House-passed National Defense Authorization Act, the legislation that authorizes the annual budget for the U.S. military, Crane referred to Black people as “colored people”. The amendment, which was adopted in a 214-210 vote, aims to prohibit the Defense Department from considering race, gender, religion, political affiliations or “any other” when making decisions.
Crane said his amendment “has nothing to do with whether or not colored people or Black people or anybody can serve”. His amendment would prohibit the Pentagon from requiring participation in training or support for “certain race-based concepts” in the hiring, promotion or retention of individuals.
The comment drew swift rebuke from Democratic lawmakers and the Congressional Black Caucus. In response, Crane said he “misspoke” and apologized for his remarks.
The amendment was adopted in a 214-210 vote. The National Defense Authorization Act is expected to pass the House this week. If passed, the bill would then move to the Senate for consideration.
Crane’s comments have sparked a debate over the use of language when discussing race and ethnicity. While some argue that the term “colored people” is outdated and offensive, others argue that it is an acceptable term to use in certain contexts. Regardless, Crane’s comments have highlighted the importance of using language that is respectful and inclusive.
Be First to Comment