Key takeaways:
- The Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of a deaf student from Sturgis, Michigan, who sued his public school system for providing an inadequate education.
- The ruling is a victory for students with disabilities, who often face discrimination and inadequate support in the classroom.
- The ruling is a reminder of the importance of providing students with disabilities the resources they need to succeed.
The Supreme Court ruled unanimously on Tuesday in favor of a deaf student from Sturgis, Michigan, who sued his public school system for providing an inadequate education. Miguel Luna Perez had attended the school district for 12 years, during which time his parents allege that the school system neglected him and lied to them about his progress, permanently stunting his ability to communicate.
Perez and his family had already settled a complaint against the school system, with officials agreeing to pay for additional schooling and sign language instruction. However, the Supreme Court ruled that they could also pursue money damages under a different federal law, the American with Disabilities Act (ADA).
The court’s ruling is a victory for students with disabilities, who often face discrimination and inadequate support in the classroom. According to the complaint, the school district failed to provide qualified aides who could adequately translate into sign language, which is essential for deaf students to access the curriculum.
The ruling is also a reminder of the importance of providing students with disabilities the resources they need to succeed. Without the right support, students with disabilities can be left behind in the classroom and denied the opportunity to reach their full potential.
Be First to Comment